New York Divorce Lawyer J Douglas Barics Matrimonial Attorney

Law Office of
J. Douglas Barics
Divorce and Family Law

NY Divorce Attorney J Douglas Barics Family Law Lawyer

1399 Franklin Ave. Suite 202, Garden City, NY 11530    Phone: (516) 742-2600    Email: lawyer@jdbar.com



Family Court Act 1046
FCA 1046: Evidence



Family Court Act 1046

Evidence

    (a) In any hearing under this article


    (i)  proof  of  the  abuse or neglect of one child shall be admissible  evidence on the issue of the abuse or neglect of any other child of,  or  the legal responsibility of, the respondent; and


    (ii)  proof  of injuries sustained by a child or of the condition of a child of such a nature as would ordinarily not  be  sustained  or  exist except  by reason of the acts or omissions of the parent or other person responsible for the care of such child shall be prima facie evidence  of child  abuse  or  neglect,  as  the  case may be, of the parent or other person legally responsible; and


    (iii) proof that a person  repeatedly  misuses  a  drug  or  drugs  or alcoholic  beverages, to the extent that it has or would ordinarily have  the effect of producing in the  user  thereof  a  substantial  state  of stupor, unconsciousness, intoxication, hallucination, disorientation, or incompetence,  or a substantial impairment of judgment, or a substantial manifestation of irrationality, shall be prima  facie  evidence  that  a child  of  or  who  is  the  legal  responsibility  of  such person is a neglected child except that such drug or alcoholic beverage misuse shall not be prima facie evidence of neglect when such person  is  voluntarily and regularly participating in a recognized rehabilitative program; and


    (iv)  any  writing,  record  or  photograph, whether in the form of an entry in a book or otherwise, made as a  memorandum  or  record  of  any condition,  act, transaction, occurrence or event relating to a child in an abuse or neglect proceeding of any hospital or any  other  public  or private  agency  shall  be  admissible  in  evidence  in  proof  of that condition, act, transaction, occurrence or event,  if  the  judge  finds that  it was made in the regular course of the business of any hospital, or any other public or private agency and that it  was  in  the  regular course of such business to make it, at the time of the act, transaction, occurrence   or  event,  or  within  a  reasonable  time  thereafter.  A certification by the head  of  or  by  a  responsible  employee  of  the hospital  or  agency  that the writing, record or photograph is the full and complete record of said condition, act, transaction,  occurrence  or event  and that it was made in the regular course of the business of the hospital or agency and that  it  was  in  the  regular  course  of  such business  to  make  it,  at the time of the condition, act, transaction, occurrence or event, or within a reasonable time  thereafter,  shall  be prima  facie  evidence  of  the facts contained in such certification. A certification by someone other than the head of the hospital  or  agency shall  be accompanied by a photocopy of a delegation of authority signed by both the head of the hospital or agency and by such  other  employee. All  other  circumstances  of  the  making  of the memorandum, record or photograph, including lack of personal knowledge of the  maker,  may  be proved   to   affect   its   weight,  but  they  shall  not  affect  its admissibility; and


    (v) any report filed with the  statewide  central  register  of  child abuse  and  maltreatment  by  a  person  or  official  required to do so pursuant to section four hundred thirteen of  the  social  services  law shall be admissible in evidence; and


    (vi) previous statements made by the child relating to any allegations of   abuse   or   neglect  shall  be  admissible  in  evidence,  but  if uncorroborated, such statements  shall  not  be  sufficient  to  make  a fact-finding  of abuse or neglect. Any other evidence tending to support the reliability of the previous statements, including, but  not  limited to the types of evidence defined in this subdivision shall be sufficient corroboration. The testimony of the child shall not be necessary to make a fact-finding of abuse or neglect; and


    (vii)  neither  the privilege attaching to confidential communications between husband and wife, as set forth in section forty-five hundred two of the civil practice law  and  rules,  nor  the  physician-patient  and related  privileges,  as set forth in section forty-five hundred four of the civil practice law and rules, nor the psychologist-client privilege, as  set  forth in section forty-five hundred seven of the civil practice law and rules, nor the social worker-client privilege, as set  forth  in section  forty-five  hundred  eight of the civil practice law and rules, nor the rape crisis counselor-client privilege, as set forth in  section forty-five  hundred  ten of the civil practice law and rules, shall be a  ground for excluding evidence which otherwise would be admissible.


(viii) proof of the "impairment of emotional health" or "impairment of mental or emotional condition" as  a  result  of  the  unwillingness  or inability  of the respondent to exercise a minimum degree of care toward a child may include  competent  opinion  or  expert  testimony  and  may include  proof  that  such  impairment lessened during a period when the  child was in the care, custody or supervision  of  a  person  or  agency other than the respondent.


    (b) In a fact-finding hearing: (i) any determination that the child is an  abused  or  neglected  child  must  be  based  on a preponderance of evidence; (ii) whenever a  determination of severe or repeated  abuse  is  based upon  clear  and convincing evidence, the fact-finding order shall state that such determination is based on clear and convincing evidence; and (iii) except as otherwise provided by this  article,  only  competent,
  material and relevant evidence may be admitted.


    (c)  In  a  dispositional  hearing  and  during  all other stages of a proceeding under this  article,  except  a  fact-finding  hearing,  only material and relevant evidence may be admitted.




This section of the Family Court Act is provided as part of a free educational service by J. Douglas Barics, attorney at law for reference only. Statutes and codes such as FCA 1046 are frequently amended, and no representation is made that the above version of FCA 1046 is current. Updated statutes and codes may be available at the New York State Legislature Website. No statute should be relied on without understanding controlling case law which may further interpret it. An attorney should be consulted for legal advice.


If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact Mr. Barics at lawyer@jdbar.com or (516) 742-2600. For more articles and information, please visit www.jdbar.com.


J. Douglas Barics, Esq. – Divorce, family, matrimonial lawyer in Long Island, New York


[Home] [FAQ] [Glossary] [Articles] [Cases] [Statutes] [Forms] [Resources] [JDB] [Current Rates] [Contact] [Directions]